This week, notorious Hollywood film producer Harvey Weinstein finally faced justice. The convicted rapist will face upwards to 25 years in jail for his crimes. The end to this dark chapter in our country has caused many to stop and ask questions. Why did so many Democrats except support from this man? And a new tidbit of information is giving Hillary Clinton a hard time.
Let’s get this out of the way first: Harvey Weinstein’s reputation for abusing women was well-known in Hollywood. If you paid attention over the years, you would have heard comments and jokes (on TV shows and award ceremonies) about Weinstein’s behavior around young, attractive actresses. If that is what they let slip out in public, imagine what people knew in private?
Notable actors (including Ben Affleck and Meryl Streep to name two) openly praised Weinstein for years. Worse than that, powerful Democrats celebrated the man. In fact, Michelle Obama thanked Weinstein during a 2013 event at the White House. She called him a “good friend” and a “wonderful human being.” Damn. That’s the kind of person she considers wonderful? Talk about setting the bar very low.
But, to be fair, Democrats are quick to shower praise on a person—when they give them lots of money. It seems the left ignored the mountain of evidence against Weinstein, because he was writing them checks. When the news broke that he had hurt many, many women, these liberals tried to distance themselves from the man.
Too bad we have records proving the Democrats were in bed with Weinstein for many years. And they did little to investigate the growing reports of his crimes. Now, a new report has come out, revealing just who profited from Weinstein the most: feminist-in-chief Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton raked-in more cash from convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein than any other politician despite brushing off his donations by claiming he gave money to “every” Democrat.
Federal Election Commission filings show the disgraced movie mogul bundled $1.4 million for Clinton during her presidential bid in 2016 and handed her another $73,390 dating back to her 1999 New York Senate seat run.
On Tuesday, the former first lady defended her long relationship with the sex creep, quickly deflecting scrutiny from reporters by noting that Weinstein also raised funds for Barack Obama, John Kerry and Al Gore during their presidential bids…
The Miramax founder raised $72,100 for Obama but only bundled $679,000 for his 2012 reelection bid — half of what he raised for Clinton, the FEC data shows. [Source: Fox News]
As usual, when confronted with this news, Hillary Clinton tried to deflect. Unwilling to ever admit a wrong, she tried to throw her fellow Democrats under the bus. What a class act.
Yes, it’s true Weinstein gave big bucks to Obama, Kerry, and Gore. Perhaps that’s why these hypocrites refused to look into allegations against him. But the person who benefitted the most from Weinstein’s contributions was Hillary Clinton.
You have to wonder about the relationship between Weinstein and the former first lady. You don’t give millions of dollars to a stranger. And even though politicians are greedy for cash, wouldn’t you think they’d only take money from people they trusted?
How could Hillary turn a blind eye to Weinstein’s behavior all those years? Do you seriously believe she didn’t know? At the very least, she should have looked into the many rumors and stories that floated around Hollywood, for nearly thirty years.
It’s easy for her to say, now, that she didn’t now. But is anyone buying that? The woman took millions from the man. Shouldn’t that warrant some kind of investigation by our government?
Or will Hillary, once again, escape justice?